https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116730
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Hime Haieto from comment #27) > Also, the links don't even correctly point to the sources in the first > place, They do for me. > yet the build still completed for me with broken symlinks anyway. As That makes no sense. > for why I tried removing the manual make rule entirely a little earlier. The files are needed for the build, so I don't see how it can complete without them. We certainly can't just remove those rules, because then the files wouldn't be compiled.
