https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116656

--- Comment #4 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
valgrind --leak-check=full ./z
==99899== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==99899== Copyright (C) 2002-2024, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==99899== Using Valgrind-3.23.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==99899== Command: ./z
==99899== 
 construct_foo
 construct_foo
==99899== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==99899==    at 0x40098D: MAIN__ (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400A52: main (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899== 
==99899== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==99899==    at 0x4009AC: MAIN__ (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400A52: main (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899== 
==99899== Invalid read of size 8
==99899==    at 0x4009AC: MAIN__ (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400A52: main (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==  Address 0x28 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==99899== 
==99899== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV):
dumping core
==99899==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x28
==99899==    at 0x4009AC: MAIN__ (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400A52: main (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==99899==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==99899==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==99899==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==99899==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 16777216.
==99899== 
==99899== HEAP SUMMARY:
==99899==     in use at exit: 5,478 bytes in 20 blocks
==99899==   total heap usage: 20 allocs, 0 frees, 5,478 bytes allocated
==99899== 
==99899== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 20
==99899==    at 0x484C2E4: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:450)
==99899==    by 0x400890: __test_MOD_foo_construct (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400936: __test_MOD_make (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x40097A: MAIN__ (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400A52: main (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899== 
==99899== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 20
==99899==    at 0x484C2E4: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:450)
==99899==    by 0x400890: __test_MOD_foo_construct (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400942: __test_MOD_make (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x40097A: MAIN__ (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899==    by 0x400A52: main (in /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z)
==99899== 
==99899== LEAK SUMMARY:
==99899==    definitely lost: 2 bytes in 2 blocks
==99899==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==99899==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==99899==    still reachable: 5,284 bytes in 17 blocks
==99899==         suppressed: 192 bytes in 1 blocks
==99899== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==99899== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all

Reply via email to