https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargls from comment #6) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > > Tentative obvious fix for NULL pointer dereference: > > > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc > > index 7ab82fa2f5b..de38f4a808f 100644 > > --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc > > +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc > > @@ -1692,7 +1692,8 @@ transfer_namelist_element (stmtblock_t * block, const > > char * var_name, > > gcc_assert (sym || c); > > > > /* Build the namelist object name. */ > > - if (sym && !sym->attr.use_only && sym->attr.use_rename) > > + if (sym && !sym->attr.use_only && sym->attr.use_rename > > + && sym->ns->use_stmts->rename) > > string = gfc_build_cstring_const > > (sym->ns->use_stmts->rename->local_name); > > else > > string = gfc_build_cstring_const (var_name); > > Patch looks good. If it passes regression testing, you can commit it you > want. Yes, it passed. I was just packaging it for submission, but given your OK I will push to master and inform the list.
