https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116462
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
no forget it, this might make arm unhappy...
lets try this instead:
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-/* Verify that both inline instances have a DW_AT_ranges but
- no extra DW_TAG_lexical_block. */
+/* Verify that at least one of both inline instances have
+ a DW_AT_ranges but no extra DW_TAG_lexical_block. */
/* { dg-options "-O -gdwarf -dA" } */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\)
DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine" 2 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_ranges" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler " DW_AT_ranges" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\)
DW_TAG_lexical_block" 0 } } */
static int foo (int i)
