https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> > Created attachment 58799 [details]
> > Revised test case with careful precision and tolerance values.
> >
> > New suggested test case which passes on x86-64-linux.
>
> We removed the test from our postcommit allowlist about 2 weeks ago and
> haven't seen any flakiness appear since on riscv. Not sure if that's the
> same on other architectures.
>
> https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues?q=gfortran.
> dg%2Fpr105361.f90
>
> also tested the new testcase in c16 on riscv and haven't seen any failures.
This confirms my suspicions. The original test was making floating point
comparisons and floating ppoint is not exact and depends on architecture. I
will push this revised test.
