https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116433
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The real fix is to have named address spaces support extended to C++. See > PR43745. That's a different issue. EEPROM handling is too complicated, we don't want /that/ code in the compiler and support > 300 devices where each one might need different SFR handling. When you want EEPROM support, you can just wrap routines from AVR-LibC. But that's not possible with PR43745 because there is no way you can specify that VTABLEs be located in flash *and* to use the appropriate access instructions. It isn't possible in GCC either because just putting VTALBEs in progmem won't fd the trick of using the right accessor instructions.
