https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116390
--- Comment #13 from Detlef Vollmann <dv at vollmann dot ch> --- On 8/18/24 22:42, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The segmentation fault as reported above has been fixed with comment #2. So > for what reason did you reopen this PR? Sorry, I don't really know the procedures here. As it turns out, this PR actually reports two bugs, one for -O2 with the error message in the description and one for -O3 and -O4 for which the error message is in the attachment (created by -freport-bug). The first bug got resolved with your patch (thanks again!) and the second one seems to be a duplicate of PR116389, which isn't fixed yet. So setting this PR to resolved/fixed seemed not appropriate to me. But I agree that resolved/duplicate isn't a really correct solution either. As I said, I don't know the GCC policy here, so feel free to set it to resolved/fixed again if you think that's correct. Detlef
