https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Harald, I logged various regressions before going on vacation. I'll be back in action next week. Regards Paul On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 at 20:58, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > Last reconfirmed| |2024-08-13 > > --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Running the resulting executable under valgrind shows issues that were not > present in gcc-14: there are many reports of the type > > ==11462== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > ==11462== at 0x48386ED: malloc (in > /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) > ==11462== by 0x428DF0: __final_MAIN___T.1 (sizeof_6.f90:5) > ==11462== by 0x42AF7C: __final_MAIN___T2.5 (sizeof_6.f90:5) > ==11462== by 0x426D1E: MAIN__ (sizeof_6.f90:281) > ==11462== by 0x42D581: main (sizeof_6.f90:287) > ==11462== > [...] > ==11462== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 > ==11462== at 0x428FD3: __final_MAIN___T.1 (sizeof_6.f90:5) > ==11462== by 0x42AF7C: __final_MAIN___T2.5 (sizeof_6.f90:5) > ==11462== by 0x426D1E: MAIN__ (sizeof_6.f90:281) > ==11462== by 0x42D581: main (sizeof_6.f90:287) > ==11462== > [...] > > Commenting lines 281..287 (six deallocates at the end of the main), > the issues seems to disappears. > > A bookkeeping issue in the finalization? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
