https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116323
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |10.1.0
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail| |11.1.0, 14.1.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2024-08-10
Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
|record_type or union_type |ICE: tree check: expected
|or qual_union_type, have |record_type or union_type
|bound_template_template_par |or qual_union_type, have
|m in access_in_type, at |bound_template_template_par
|cp/search.cc:663 |m in access_in_type, at
| |cp/search.cc:663
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
Slightly cleaned up testcase:
```
class A { enum Enum{}; };
template <typename E,
template<typename> class Alloc>
struct B : Alloc<E>, A
{
};
template <typename E,
template<typename> class Alloc>
int B<E, Alloc>::abcde( Enum m) { }
```
