https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260
--- Comment #4 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #3) > Thanks for the additional information, indeed in our CI we do not run > validations for several "variations", so it's not surprising this case is > not handled very well. > > So you suggest having one manifest per variation, and calling > validate_failures.py --manifest manifest.var1 --build_dir xxx --variation > var1 > etc ? I think this would work best, yeah -- the other option I had in mind wrt suffixes feels messy and feels like someone will ask for the other suggested behaviour.
