https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I think this is just a testsuite issue with this:
> if (argc == 0)
> b = 1;
>
> This might fix it:
> ```
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c
> index 368a8b20cbf..1016f2579cb 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,13 @@ __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void foo (int x)
> c++;
> }
>
> +volatile int t = 1;
> +
> int
> main (int argc, char* argv[])
> {
> int j, k, b = 0;
> - if (argc == 0)
> + if (t == 0)
> b = 1;
> for (j = 0; j < 3; j++)
> for (k = 0; k < 1; k++)
>
> ```
>
> That is for simulator runs you can't depend on the value of argc being 1 .
Hmm, this is not documented in internals manual either. I thought it was.
Examples patches from before:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/4aac5e64-ec17-5ff8-9cad-1e09c2007...@codesourcery.com/
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/CA+=Sn1mnnVXFQEGtno_9wE1oJM0mCs8GNc-cv5oVxO7856Sy=q...@mail.gmail.com/
I thought there has been others (before my one) but I can't find them.
