https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103358

Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
now I see: T = {const<lambda(int, char, double)>&, int&, char&, double&}, which
I think is reasonable.  what was being seen is a double-reference, so this is
probably a dupe of PR104981 which patrick fixed the other day

> T = {const<lambda(int, char, double)>&&, int&, char&, double&} here, what is 
> the type `const<lambda(int, char, double)>&&`?

it was a double reference (which was wrong)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104981 ***

Reply via email to