https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103358
Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
now I see: T = {const<lambda(int, char, double)>&, int&, char&, double&}, which
I think is reasonable. what was being seen is a double-reference, so this is
probably a dupe of PR104981 which patrick fixed the other day
> T = {const<lambda(int, char, double)>&&, int&, char&, double&} here, what is
> the type `const<lambda(int, char, double)>&&`?
it was a double reference (which was wrong)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104981 ***
