https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116103
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Similarly for '-march=gfx908':
(In reply to myself from comment #0)
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-bound-2.c scan-tree-dump-not
> ivopts "zero if "
..., and:
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/cond_smax_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmp_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 80
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/cond_smin_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmp_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 80
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/cond_umax_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmp_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 56
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/cond_umin_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmp_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 56
..., but not the following ones:
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/smax_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmpx_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 80
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/smin_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmpx_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 80
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/umax_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmpx_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 56
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/umin_1.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tv_cmpx_gt_i32\\tvcc, s[0-9]+, v[0-9]+ 56
..., as these already did FAIL before (for '-march=gfx1030', '-march=gfx1100').
