https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116053

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-07-25
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.


(insn 59 17 61 2 (set (reg:DI 1 dx [ _7+8 ])
        (mem:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 0 ax [108])
                (const_int 8 [0x8])) [1 MEM[(__int128 *)_1]+8 S8 A64]))
"/app/example.cpp":5:7 discrim 1 88 {*movdi_internal}
     (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:DI 1 dx [ _7+8 ])
        (expr_list:REG_EH_REGION (const_int 1 [0x1])
            (nil))))
(note 61 59 60 3 [bb 3] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 60 61 53 3 (set (reg:DI 0 ax [orig:100 _7 ] [100])
        (mem:DI (reg/f:DI 0 ax [108]) [1 MEM[(__int128 *)_1]+0 S8 A128]))
"/app/example.cpp":5:7 discrim 1 88 {*movdi_internal}
     (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:DI 0 ax [orig:100 _7 ] [100])
        (expr_list:REG_EH_REGION (const_int 1 [0x1])
            (nil))))



insn 59: replaced reg 0 with 7
rescanning insn with uid = 59.
ending the processing of deferred insns
df_analyze called
df_worklist_dataflow_doublequeue: n_basic_blocks 7 n_edges 7 count 7 (    1)
deferring rescan insn with uid = 15.
deferring deletion of insn with uid = 59.

But then we don't update the basic blocks correctly ...

Reply via email to