https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116051
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I really wish int(typedef_for_void) was not valid, as I see no valid reason for
ever needing to do that, but I agree that GCC is following the standard here.
