https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105989
--- Comment #11 from Michal Jankovič <michal.jankovic59 at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10) > actually I thought I explained the issue in email to Michal - that we need > to make some changes for correctness to these mechanisms and therefore that > we should defer the optimisation until those are done. Ok, I must have missed that or misremembered; I remember you recommending I get some real-world stats on the memory savings to help make this higher priority, but I couldn't find the time. > I have Michal's patch in my local queue and we now have some funding to take > things forward. This optimisation is 100% on the TODO. Great!
