https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We could try to record the size portion that is known to _not_ simplify
(like volatile stores) and do (unr_insns - (unr_insns - size.fixed) * 1 / 3)
to not over-estimate the 2/3 shrinking in cases like this.  Or count
the insn part that is a candidate for later simplification/CSE - that's
mostly all IV dependent stmts (that are not volatile) and that didn't end up
estimated constant.

Reply via email to