https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #11)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > > Reduced more:
> > >
> > > long double
> > > test (long double xx)
> > > {
> > > __asm ("" :: "f"(xx));
> > > return xx + 1;
> > > }
> > >
> > > and this one fails at -O2 & -O3 too.
> >
> > I'm not sure if this should be an error or not...
>
> So for such an inline assembly, we prefer a compiler output type mismatch
> error, similar to riscv？
I agree. But I'm slightly concerned if the ICE will pop out again in some
cases using a pair of GPR for TFmode or TImode (I cannot see a difference...)
