https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115747
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> I think we want parallel changes for the vec and non-vec cases.
Of course, left those out for brevity.
> I agree that the diagnostic message needs to be different for C++26, just
> that the C++26 diagnostic should also be affected by -Wno-delete-incomplete.
So
@@ -4114,6 +4114,21 @@ build_vec_delete_1 (location_t loc, tree
if (!COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
{
+ if (cxx_dialect > cxx23)
+ {
+ if (complain & tf_error)
+ {
+ if (warn_delete_incomplete
+ && permerror (loc, "operator %<delete []%> used on "
+ "incomplete type"))
+ {
+ cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic (base, type, DK_PERMERROR);
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
if (complain & tf_warning)
{
auto_diagnostic_group d;
then? -Wno-delete-incomplete will make it silently accepted except during
SFINAE,
-fpermissive accepted with a warning?
And obviously I'll adjust the testsuite to whatever is chosen.
