https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115698
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Since `ld.libhugetlbfs` does not extract argument from `@file`, it cannot
> consume the custom argument, and that is fed eventually to original `ld`,
> where the arguments are finally extracted.
That would be a bug in ld.libhugetlbfs then. Basically the @file is used so the
size of the options does not get too big. The original BFD Ld understands @file
and able to take all and all options there.
Basically ld.libhugetlbfs needs to support @ syntax to extract all options and
then create a new file to pass on to the real ld.
