https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115712
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- Created attachment 58541 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58541&action=edit A testcase [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$ g++ -c -O2 x.cc -ansi [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$ readelf -rW x.o | c++filt | grep -E "(new|delete)" 000000000000000a 0000000c00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 operator new[](unsigned long) - 4 0000000000000019 0000000d00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 operator delete[](void*) - 4 0000000000000028 0000000f00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 operator new[](unsigned long, std::nothrow_t const&) - 4 000000000000003c 0000000d00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 operator delete[](void*) - 4 [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$ /usr/gcc-15.0.0-x86-64/bin/g++ -c -O2 x.cc -ansi [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$ readelf -rW x.o | c++filt | grep -E "(new|delete)" 000000000000000f 0000000d00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 operator new[](unsigned long, std::nothrow_t const&) - 4 000000000000001c 0000000e00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 operator delete[](void*) - 4 [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$ new and delete update "pass". They can't be folded without updating "pass".
