https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115531
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Maybe ifcvt can produce a masked store version if this pattern ... Maybe add another argument to .MASK_STORE to say it was originally unconditional store? Or something like that.
