https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115429

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is essentially a dup of PR99678 -- we should have rejected the
requires-clause at parse time since unqualified lookup for 'con' failed, but
because we didn't we naturally ended up repeating unqualified lookup at
instantiation time which succeeded.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99678 ***

Reply via email to