https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Sorry. I bet something in reorg actually uses a barrier insn as a reference. > I'll revert those three patches unless I can fix the problem within 24 hours > (not counting regtest-time). Ok. For this night's bootstrap, I'm using the tree at the revision before the culprit patch. I tried to revert just that one, but failed (conflicts and manual resolution failed compiling stage 1 libgcc). > Incidentally, can you please post a configure line for cfarm210 or cfarm211 > that works? (A no-options line failed to find some library during bootstrap > so > I originally bailed on sparc testing.) You should use cfarm216 instead: it's way faster than the others and runs Solaris 11.4, which is the only OS release supported on trunk. Aldy, when investigating PR ipa/114985, got along with just configure && make -j128 && make check -j128 -k While that has its downsides, for the purposes of this investigation it should do the trick.
