https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
--- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Harald, I simply copied all the associated functions in trans-expr.cc from mainline and plonked them in 13-branch. That's why I said that I hadn't done any weeding. There is also a commit from Jakub in there as well. I'll check to see if the associated PRs are fixed. I got into regression fixing before the 14.1 release and this was one of the low hanging fruit. To be honest, I am not especially bothered about fixing it or not. Up until the ICE of the PR it was giving an error on valid code. I would prefer though that the ICE went away! Cheers Paul On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 19:18, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6) > > Created attachment 58277 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > This was substantially fixed on 14-branch by the patch for PR49213. > However, > > there have been many subsequent changes to gfc_trans_structure_assign and > > its subsidiary functions as the attachment demonstrates. > > > > I haven't attempted to do any weeding of the changes to separate those > > responsible for fixing this PR. However, 13-branch regtests successfuly > with > > the patch applied. > > > > Should I commit this with a testcase or just close the PR? > > > > Paul > > Paul, > > can you summarize where you gathered the pieces of this patch from? > > From a quick glance, r14-870 and r14-2160 (both yours) seem to be involved. > > Does it also fix any of the issues addressed by the respective PRs? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You are the assignee for the bug.
