https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > It's possible that all the lambda frames are inlined, or skip+2 in > stacktrace.cc causes us to skip real frames that we should keep, or maybe > libbacktrace just doesn't work on this target. In the Solaris case, the libbacktrace tests all PASS on all of 32 and 64-bit SPARC and x86. The stacktrace failures only happen on 32-bit x86; 64-bit x86 is fine. I'm now trying a debug build and plan to compare i386 and amd64 side by side to find differences.