https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978

--- Comment #14 from Chen Chen <chz0808 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #13)
> (In reply to Chen Chen from comment #12)
> 
> > No. I used system default gcc.
> 
> AOSC backports *many* changes not in upstream GCC 13.2 to their "13.2":
> https://github.com/AOSC-Dev/aosc-os-abbs/tree/stable/core-devel/gcc/01-
> runtime/patches
> 
> So the default GCC is simply not GCC 13.2.

You are correct. The above 13.2 results should be "AOSC system default gcc
13.2" results. Under AOSC system I recompiled official gcc 13.2 source with the
same parameters except for "--with-tune=la664" (changed to "--with-tune=la464"
since gcc 13.2 does not support "LA664" architecture). The test results from
official gcc 13.2 are following:

-g -Ofast -march=native      : 6.54 (400s)
-g -Ofast -march=native -flto: 6.57 (399s)
-g -Ofast -march=la464       : 6.46 (405s)
-g -Ofast -march=la464 -flto : 6.57 (399s)

Reply via email to