https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111475
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thanks. I've been working on this on cfarm216; I have a messy set of patches with this improvement to g++.sum with analyzer.exp so far: # of expected passes 11395 -> 12015 # of unexpected failures 684 -> 64 # of unexpected successes 4 -> 0 # of expected failures 443 -> 447 # of unsupported tests 50 However I'm don't have access to my regular workstation/testing box until late tomorrow, so I'm holding off on posting until I've cleaned them up and put them through my usual testing regime. Sorry again about the noise