https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111475
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks. I've been working on this on cfarm216; I have a messy set of patches
with this improvement to g++.sum with analyzer.exp so far:
# of expected passes 11395 -> 12015
# of unexpected failures 684 -> 64
# of unexpected successes 4 -> 0
# of expected failures 443 -> 447
# of unsupported tests 50
However I'm don't have access to my regular workstation/testing box until late
tomorrow, so I'm holding off on posting until I've cleaned them up and put them
through my usual testing regime.
Sorry again about the noise