https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111475

David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks.  I've been working on this on cfarm216; I have a messy set of patches
with this improvement to g++.sum with analyzer.exp so far:

# of expected passes           11395 -> 12015
# of unexpected failures         684 ->    64
# of unexpected successes          4 ->     0
# of expected failures           443 ->   447
# of unsupported tests            50

However I'm don't have access to my regular workstation/testing box until late
tomorrow, so I'm holding off on posting until I've cleaned them up and put them
through my usual testing regime.

Sorry again about the noise

Reply via email to