https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92840

--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As determined during patch review, there's still an unresolved issue:

On 2024-04-16T17:12:17+0800, Chung-Lin Tang <clt...@baylibre.com> wrote:
> If we continue to use k->refcount itself as the flag holder of map type, I 
> guess we will not be able to directly determine whether it is a
> structured or dynamic adjustment at that point. Probably need a new field 
> entirely.

Reply via email to