https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114715
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2024-04-15
Known to fail| |13.2.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. The branches emitted by pass_lower_switch_O0 lack location info,
so does the switch itself, already since at least gimplification.
The GENERIC SWITCH_EXPR has
{file = 0x4926cc0 "/tmp/t.c", line = 12, column = 9, data = 0x0,
sysp = false}
we set a location on the BIND we wrap the switch with though. The outer
switch is not wrapped in a BIND. That one gets the location from
annotate_all_with_location_after but this function doesn't recurse into
structured gimple.
It's easy to manually set the switch stmt location, annotating random
nested GIMPLE with a location might be odd. Maybe instead of
gimple_set_location (bind, EXPR_LOCATION (switch_expr));
we should also set all of the BIND_BODY locations as well?
Jakub, any preference?
