https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Interesting it was mentioned here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2003-12/msg00336.html
I wonder if we could mark the BLOCK as being the try block and then output
DW_TAG_try_block instead of DW_TAG_lexical_block . Likewise for catch.
Maybe I will give that a go for GCC 15. Though I might be only handle the C++
front-end. Others will need to handle other FEs.
