https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111151
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e commit r14-9676-gf536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Mar 26 16:40:53 2024 +0100 testsuite: Fix up pr111151.c testcase [PR114486] Apparently I've somehow screwed up the adjustments of the originally tested testcase, tweaked it so that in the second/third cases it actually see a MAX_EXPR rather than COND_EXPR the MAX_EXPR has been optimized into, and didn't update the expected value. 2024-03-26 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/111151 PR testsuite/114486 * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c (main): Fix up expected value for f.
