https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> > If you can think of a workaround, please let me know, as unfortunately this
> > loop is the one where the assert in the other bug gets hit :(
>
> An easy workaround is to add:
> asm("":::"memory");
>
> Right after the opening `{`.
> But that might be too much of a hammer in some cases ...
Even a simple `__builtin_printf("");` added to the loop might avoid the
vectorization to figure out where the wrong code happens.
