https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114049
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-16
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
according to information from the Apple OSS folks, the Kernel.framework is/was
(never) intended to be used as a regular framework. [This was news to me,
FWIW, and it does seem a somewhat odd situation, since it's wrapped up in all
the necessary machinery which makes it look like it should work].
.... anyway ....
What we want from this test is that a suitable framework is found in
/System/Library/Frameworks when the user has also given a local framework path
(-F.).
What we want to avoid is the test regressing because of incidental SDK changes
(like unguarded Apple Black usage) - so we have picked the kernel framework and
a suitable low-complexity header.
At present, I am thinking that IOkit/IOReturn.h might be a suitable substitute
- but that needs to be checked across the range of OS versions supported.
