https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114273
Bug ID: 114273 Summary: `PHI(a, MIN(b, c)) < c` is not optimized to just `PHI(a,b) < c` Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Take: ``` void dummy(void); bool f(unsigned a, unsigned b, bool c) { unsigned ind = b; if (c) { dummy(); ind = a > 6 ? 6 : a; } return ind < 6; } bool f2(unsigned a, unsigned b, bool c) { unsigned ind = b; if (c) { dummy(); ind = a; } return ind < 6; } ``` GCC should be able to remove the MIN_EXPR in f. Note GCC is able to optimize `MIN_EXPR<a,b> < b` since r14-3922-g06bedc3860d3e6 . This seems like PRE is the place for this kind of optimization but I am not 100% sure.