https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #2)
> It looks like the 'selector' in this case is an expr.
>
> The expr must be a pointer object or a 'designator'
>
> A designator must be:
>
> R901
> designator
>
> object-name
> array-element
> array-section
> coindexed-named-object
> complex-part-designator
> structure-component
> substring
>
> I am not seeing the expr in the example as one of these listed. ???
Yep, agreed. I went back an re-read the section about ASSOCIATE.
Not sure how I convinced myself that a constant expression, which
reduces to a constant is okay.
I suppose the question is "do we generate a better error message
or simply close the PR?"
