https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114075
--- Comment #4 from jchrist at linux dot ibm.com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Ah, there is > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/645928.html > but that didn't come up with a testcase. > Not sure if checking FLOAT_MODE_P is the right thing, whether it wouldn't be > better to check !ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (vectype) or !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P > (TREE_TYPE (vectype)). Hi, yes, that patch was designed to fix this problem. But thinking about it, I guess your second suggestion would be better.
