https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109804
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #9)
> Right. Local unnamed enums are of the DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE type,
> but those don't have their subtrees filed as per
> cplus_demangle_fill_component. So I think we can't do *newc.u.s_binary.left
> when the type is DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE. Maybe they need a new
> case in new_delete_mismatch_p.
ret->type = DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE;
ret->u.s_number.number = num;
Yes and we just need to compare the number.
Let me add that and test it.
