https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6); > > and the value re-interpretation goes off. Martin - we may have dups of this > but SRA shouldn't do this (it possibly gets confused by the x.d store)? Yes I think pr 93271 is a dup of this.
