https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113986

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #2)
> Confirmed. I never heard about that config - at the time I tried it on an
> old system with GCC4.8 and that built and passed all tests. I can't see a
> reason to ever switch off ifuncs...

The only reason is to test it without ifuncs. Musl libc unlike glibc does not
have ifunc support. Why because it is supposed to be an "embedded" libc but I
am not sure if that is not a good reason not support ifuncs really because I
can see an use case between 2 different generations of SoCs using the same
rootfs to run an application and such.

Reply via email to