https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think I can handle it like the VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR case, bet with _BitInt(511)
it would actually be a VCE, but when it is same size BITINT_TYPE to
INTEGER_TYPE we choose NOP_EXPR.
That said, I think it would be better if the memcpy folding used say vector
types instead of these extra large integer types.

Reply via email to