https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113830
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2024-02-08
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bo Wang from comment #0)
> It appears that if a template function has an internally defined local class
> that uses a dependent name in its member function, it can cause the
> compiler's name-binding process to get into trouble.
Or GCC just doesn't check the default argument because it's not used?
