https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110075
--- Comment #6 from Viktor Ostashevskyi <ostash at ostash dot kiev.ua> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > Yes, because we'd have to analyze the body of the function to see that it > does not return one of the parameters, which often we can't do. > > There will be an attribute soon to suppress that warning. I'm wondering whether this diagnostics should be in -Wall or -Wextra at all. It is assumed that diagnostics in -Wall or -Wextra generally "works". Here, diagnostics clearly fails on simplest case and I don't think marking huge codebase with some attribute is a proper solution...
