https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113418
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- In gcc.dg: align-2.c analyzer/torture/pr93350.c analyzer/torture/uninit-bit-field-ref.c bic-bitmask-13.c bic-bitmask-14.c bic-bitmask-15.c bic-bitmask-16.c bic-bitmask-17.c bic-bitmask-18.c bic-bitmask-19.c bic-bitmask-20.c bic-bitmask-21.c bic-bitmask-22.c bic-bitmask-7.c gomp/_Atomic-4.c gomp/pr87887-1.c gomp/pr87887-2.c gomp/pr88107.c gomp/pr95108.c graphite/run-id-5.c graphite/run-id-6.c graphite/vect-pr43423.c lto/simd-function_0.c pr104992.c signbit-2.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-25.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-2.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c tree-ssa/scev-16.c In c-c++-common: gomp/declare-variant-13.c gomp/declare-variant-14.c gomp/pr60823-2.c gomp/pr60823-4.c In gfortran.dg: gomp/declare-variant-13.f90 gomp/declare-variant-14.f90 graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 I just found them with a simple grep command so there might be false positives or false negatives. There are also a dozen matches in gcc.target but I consider them fine as the target maintainers should know exactly what they are doing.
