https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113228
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #1)
> int k[3];
It would better if we didn't depend on an uninitialized variable (I have a
patch against reassoc to not handle uninitialized/undef names) and initializing
k as:
```
int k[3]={0,0,0};
```
Still shows the issue ...
