https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113159
Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Glibc qsort had been slower than std::sort.
And in upcoming Glibc-2.39 there will be a major reimplementation of qsort, now
it's unclear if it will still keep the behavior you want. Anyway this
shouldn't be something we should rely on.
Thus I don't think this is valid.
