https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #10) > This is, mostly, a dup of PR96388. > With the problem in PR96388 fixed, I'm seeing strange -ftime-report > reporting that [wrongly?] attributes a lot of time to alias analysis. You can try -ftime-report -ftime-report-details (yeah, two options), this lists "dependent" times in other timevars beyond the passes using them.
