https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #104 from Alexander Klepikov <klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #103) > Sorry, I've been busy with other things. I think your patch is OK, but I > wanted to test it in more detail before committing it. Oh, it's OK. By the way, your contribution is not less than mine. I've been thinking about something. I suspect that this patch could take work away from other patches. I'm sorry, I don't know how to express myself properly. I mean there's several patches that corrects shift patterns and 'tst' instruction generation (most of them are written by you, by the way). I suspect that some of them might not run anymore because this patch looks more general and should cover more cases, including yet unknown cases, I hope. And, in the end, dead code may appear because of it. I hope I was able to make my point clearly.
