https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #0)
> Created attachment 56022 [details]
> Patch to add invalid-noreturn to gcc
Patches should be submitted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
For more details, please read:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted#Basics:_Contributing_to_GCC_in_10_easy_steps
Except for clang compatibility, I believe the consensus is that numerical
levels are not user-friendly. I think it would be better to have:
-Wnoreturn-implicit-return
-Wnoreturn-explicit-return
-Winvalid-noreturn enables / disables both.
