https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another testcase which shows a related issue:
```
double t = 0.0/0.0;
int
main ()
{
double x = 0.0/0.0;
return __builtin_signbit (x) != __builtin_signbit (t);
}
```
And another one:
```
double t = 0.0/0.0;
int
main ()
{
// double x = 0.0/0.0;
volatile double tt = 0.0;
return __builtin_signbit (tt/tt) != __builtin_signbit (t);
}
```
Note GCC and clang even disagree on the first testcase but agree with the
second one.
I am thinking this is all under specified really ...